Why am I defending downloading?
- The fate of libraries is linked to the fate of downloading.
- Restrictions against downloading hamper creativity and culture.
- Have you seen my mp3 collection?
Libraries, anyone? Videostores, anyone?
Peer-to-peer networks are like libraries w/o the constraints of space or time.
note: this isn't to say that P2P will replace libraries
Corporate greed encourages piracy!
- No Harry Potter 6 eBook?
- HP6 scanned, OCRed, and proofread in 12 hours
- Harry Potter 6 audio eBook?
- It costs $50(!) to download from the ITMS.
- FairPlay ain't so fair
- Playlists within iTunes containing a protected track can be copied to a CD only up to seven times (originally ten times)
- ITMS files only on iPods
- limited streaming - five listeners a day, used to be five simultaneous listeners
bonus tip: jhymn
A quick history lession
- Donaldson v Beckett was a victory for creativity and culture
- "Knowledge has no value or use for the solitary owner: to be enjoyed it must be communicated"
- This and Wheaton v. Peters rejected common law copyright
- This allowed for Walt Disney to parody Buster Keaton's "Steamboat Bill", creating the Disney empire.
- Oh yeah, he also took the violent stories of the Brothers Grimm (Cinderella, Snow White) and remixed them to be family friendly.
- Recently Disney lobbied heavily to pass and up hold the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998.
Disney would never have happened if it had to play by its own rules.
[cite]
- First meant to regulate publishing, granting a temporary monopoly
- Now it rules over copying and distribution of information
- 14 --> 50 years after the death of the author --> 70 years after the death of the author (75-90 years for corporate authorship)
- 18th century laws clashing with 21st century technology
By the way, filesharing doesn't break
Canadian copyright
"The president also has an eclectic mix of songs downloaded into his iPod from Mark McKinnon, a biking buddy and his chief media strategist in the 2004 campaign."
[cite]