We’re going to do a few site visits, including some Web enabled all-terrain buses that travel around Mexico providing access. Does that sound as cool to anyone else as it does to me?

Here I am in full turista mode at Zempoala, where Cortés headed after arriving in Mexico.

The poster was interactive. It asked readers to list things they’d like to see on library websites and nudged people toward thinking about fun, whimsical things. It wasn’t a surprise that a bunch of IAs had things to say about websites, but I was a bit surprised about how many library enthusiasts we came across.

We’re going to synthesize the suggestions that people gave us, but off the bat I can tell you that the *vast* majority of people we talked with equated library websites with OPACs. I’d like to explore this more formally.

Side note
Librarians seem to be *much better* about agreeing upon and sticking with official conference tags. I saw #ia09, #ia2009, #iasummit09, #iasummit2009, #ias09, #ias2009 on twitter. This from a bunch of people dedicated to labeling information! Fixing this is a small way in which librarians can contribute to the specialized areas of IA and User eXperience.

I have a list of sites and some strategies that I want to share but hey, I’m only one person. You know about things that I haven’t seen yet and it would be great to include some collective intelligence in the presentation.

Be assured that if you email me with your favorite new tools and websites you’ll get full credit as I’m doing my show and tell and maybe even a little thank you gift if I use something you send in.

THANKS

This being said, I did check out and use the WebWise Today’sMeet and liked it. It was more like an instant, disposable chat room than Twitter and that’s why I liked it.

• It wasn’t global. I’m pretty sure only people at the conference knew about the room and it felt very local and community-y.
• It didn’t place an emphasis on the poster. There were no pictures or avatars. Mostly it is just what people typed and a small attribution.
• It didn’t require an account or login so more people could get in on the action. It was link an IRC backchannel for all.

While tweeting about conferences via hashtags is great for people not at events, keeping up with parts of events you’re at but can’t attend, highlighting interesting ideas and people’s perceptions, Today’sMeet was nice in these other ways.

In addition to the UIE roadshow yesterday I have a bunch of fun speaking and learning opportunities coming up. I’m looking forward to it all!

2/25 : WebWise 2009
→ Social Media Iron Chef

2/17 : Drupal4Lib Camp
→ attending!

3/17 : Illinois State Library On The Front Lines: Agents of Change
→ Keynote, Creating the Usable Library

3/20 : IA Summit 2009
→ The Usable Library Website (poster session with Amanda Etches-Johnson)

3/22-27 : Gates Foundation Global Libraries Peer Learning Meeting
→ various sessions

3/28-4/2 : Computers in Libraries 2009
→ various sessions

More details and PDFs as it all unfolds.

They made some great posters for the event:

And had a big screen:

Here’s a pdf of my slides for the event: Libraries and the Read/Write Web. [11 MB]

Someone asked about what I read to keep up with all of the cool things happening on the web and in libraries. I managed to recommend using a feed reader and name a few blogs. I didn’t give a very exhaustive list mostly because my incoming self selected information stream is such a blur. I probably couldn’t name a quarter of the weblogs I subscribe to, I just pick out the interesting bits when they pop up.

To make up for my weak answer I promised to list some blogs that could make a little starter kit for keeping track of what’s happening with libraries and the read/write web. You’ll notice it is mostly non-library blogs. I’m not slighting library blogs, just highlighting the point that we need to get outside of the library and related writing.

Tech stuff
Gizmodo
NYT Technology

Design
Signal vs. Noise
information aesthetics
swissmiss

General
kottke.org
Lifehacker
TechCrunch

Misc
Pasta&Vinegar
Pink Tentacle
Wired Top Stories

Libraries
Librarian.net
LibraryCrunch
LibraryBytes
The Shifted Librarian
Swiss Army Librarian

Two more points. First, don’t click around to all of these sites every day. Use a feed reader to bring the information to you. To learn about that, see RSS in Plain English. Also, don’t limit yourself to these blogs and their feeds. Find some blogs relevant to you and your hobbies. This will get you in the habit of checking your reader frequently.

Thanks to everyone that made it a great event.

Jenny Levine and I have given a few gaming workshops at past Computers in Libraries and Internet Librarian conferences. After the sessions we’ve opened up the room to anyone interested in playing some games and/or learning about gaming. It’s proven to be a popular and really fun time, so this year Information Today has turned the post-workshop gameplay into a featured event. With refreshments even!

We’ve assembled an impressive array of games!

Systems: Nintendo Wii, Playstation 2, and Xbox 360. We’ll also have two Nintendo DS handhelds.

Games: Wii Sports, DDR, Hotel Dusk, Guitar Hero III, Professor Layton and the Curious Village, Wario Smooth Moves, whatever you bring, and Rock Band.

Since we’ll have three systems going at once, we’re opening up the option of an honest to goodness tournament with prizes. You probably want to know which game, huh? Well, it’s up to you. Sign up in the comments here or at a page we’ve created on the CIL08 wiki titled CIL08 Gaming Night to play Rock Band, Guitar Hero, or DDR. We’ll play whichever game gets the most signups!

In addition, Chris Harris is bringing some modern board games. Bring your own games, bring your latest shiny, new gadgets, and we’ll see you Sunday night!

Helene Blowers suggested that a Pecha Kucha presentation be held. Six of us will have 20 slides and 20 seconds each slide to make a point. I’m moderating the track that this is in which means I get to cut people off mid-sentence during this session. Fun! [Tuesday, Track C, 4pm]

Jenny Levine and I have been doing gaming workshops at the past couple IL and CIL conferences with some informal open gaming afterwards. It has morphed into a Sunday night event: the Gaming & Gadgets Petting Zoo. I need to start practicing being a Guitar Hero.

I’m facilitating a postconference workshop with some top notch library thinkers.
Helene Blowers, John Blyberg, Sarah Houghton-Jan and David Lee King will be giving short presentations followed by conversation and brainstorming. It should result in some great potential projects!

Tuesday morning’s keynote will be given by Erik Boekesteijn and Jaap van de Geer from the Delft Public Library. Their presentation at Internet Librarian last year might be my favorite conference moment of 2007. This should be just as good! They’ll share stories from their 2007 tour of U.S. libraries.

Tuesday night is the Second Annual InfoTubey Awards for outstanding library marketing on YouTube.

Hurrah for learning!

One thing I presented was a mockup of what a social or participatory database might look like. My slides might not be too helpful without commentary so I’ll just write a bit here. Here’s what I’d like databases to have:

→ a usable interface. Simple enough it seems, yet we direct patrons to interfaces that have 6 or more places to input data and all sorts of options to refine their searches. This is not acceptable. The example that I gave of a great interface, maybe my favorite in all the library world, is VuFind. It is an open source OPAC overlay being developed by Villanova University. I can even paste the entire link(!) to a book’s record right here because it isn’t long and ugly! http://www.vufind.org/demo/Record/397263. Here’s a bit more on VuFind from Roy Tennant in Library Journal.

→ usable urls. See above. To put a finer point on it,

http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=113&sid=85d806a6-91d6-40a8-b53b
-dac0e9002bf8%40sessionmgr102

is plain unnecessary. Why not something like http://database.com/authorID/article#?

→ history of articles retrieved. Not just saved articles in folders. The ability to turn on a feature to log all articles accessed could be useful. If the system could then generate statistics about a user’s viewing history, that would be great. Think: most accessed journals, authors, etc…

→ sharable, persistent spaces. Here I’m envisioning something like David Lanke’s Scapes concept which I find compelling. People can assemble content from databases, discussion, notes, links, a todo list, and other relevant documents like audio, video or pictures. These spaces have granular privacy and collaboration controls so that they can be shared with the world, certain networks, specific groups, all research friends, or only certain friends. Just like Yelp features their power users, so too could outstanding examples of research be highlighted by the database company. This would engage people and show off the full potential of their product.

→ embraces the open web. Library research does not exist in a library only vacuum. Research tools should reflect this and not segment themselves from the rest of the web. I don’t expect results from closed databases to appear in the open web, but it would be great to include stuff from the normal web, the web that people are accustomed to using, into databases.

→ full RSS support. Some databases (ebsco and proquest only?) are starting to get this. Customizable feeds for queries, authors, periodical titles, keywords, subjects, most saved/emailed/printed would be good. Providing javascript for RSS –> HTML would be great.

→ easy to use citation tools. In any relevant format.

→ user profiles. If something is going to have participation, there must be participants. If participant’s are meant to have meaningful identities over time, there must be user profiles. So here is what someone’s profile on a participatory database could look like, with details below.

Click through to flickr for a better view.

Things to note:

• Remember, this is someone’s homepage for a database or maybe all library databases. There’s one simple search box in the upper left.
• People can be favorited or friended. In this case the friending mechanism is a red heart by the username. Maybe a bit strong of a symbol for actual use.
• Networks link up people of common interests.
• On the left again there are links to things within FindBook and links to the open web. Customizable.
• Saved articles and shared articles. Easy access for the user, or others interested. There’s granular control over which networks, research friends, groups receive a shared article.
• Under “Networks” appears a class listing – Phil 367: Epistemology and Being. This is an example of a “persistent and sharable space.” Expanding the tab lists research friends associated with it, and clicking on the title opens it up.
• Research friends function just like friends in FaceBook. Here we have a link for easy access to articles research friends have shared.
• Groups could consist of project teammates or entire classes.
• Library information appears on the left. Here there’s information about books on reserve, eBooks and fines. Some library news and/or upcoming events would be nice too.
• Notes section is self explanatory. Maybe these should be sharable.
• And finally, there is a customizable section for specific search boxes, including open web sources.

Even though I didn’t intend for it to, this has some courseware functionality in it. I don’t know how much I’ll pursue this line of thought, but it does make sense in that a user-centered, practical research tool would be course based. A participatory database certainly wouldn’t replace anyone’s main social networking site, but it would look more like what people are accustomed to using. Because of the ability to make useful social connections people would be motivated to do research.

I hope you find my thought experiment worthwhile. A quick reminder that while light-years away from what databases currently look like, this stuff is library science, not rocket science. Isn’t like sending people to Neptune to establish a colony. Ideally I’d like to say that libraries could produce such a product but I don’t think database vendors provide the requisite APIs. So if we want something like this, we’ll have to collectively pressure them.

It isn’t entirely obvious how to design a new theme in Keynote so I’ll report what I learned from a post on MacTips. There’s a small divider directly underneath the “View” button in Keynote’s menu. Pull this down to reveal master slides.

You can design the slides to spark a new flame, then choose “File, Save Theme” to move the relationship along. You even get to give it a pet name. I’m sure I’ll fuss over it for a few days, but I’m aiming for a new theme with white letters on a grey background with light blue highlights. It might remind you of the design on walkingpaper.org, should you ever click through from your feed reader. Once I get it squared away I’ll upload it here in case it is good and you ever want a minimalist Keynote theme. *sigh*

Here’s where my new love and I have planned for the Spring:

26 Feb
National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services Annual, Philladelphia
The New Information Economy: The Changing Value of Content

3 Apr
Multonomah County Library Staff Day Keynote, Portland (!)
The Read/Write Web Opportunity

4 Apr
Margaret Chisholm Lecture, University of Washington iSchool, Seattle
Work on This, Please: Facing Current Challenges in Librarianship

6-11 Apr
Computers in Libraries, Crystal City
Various sessions and workshops

22 Apr
Suffolk County Handheld Libraries Conference Keynote, Bellport
Library in your Pocket

7 May
Massachusetts Library Association Annual, Falmouth
Having a Phone: IM Reference

8 May
Medical Library Association Annual, Chicago
Web 2.0 Panel

22 May
Catalan Library Association, Barcelona
The Read/Write Web Opportunity

27 May
ProBiblio, Amsterdam
Transatlantic Tech Librarianship

The full report is available here: “Perceptions of Idaho’s Digital Natives on Public Libraries”[pdf]. I haven’t read it yet, but considering how blown away I was by the video, I’m looking forward to it.

It might be easy to look at this comment from one of the digital natives and think “Young kids LOL they don’t get it” but that wouldn’t be fair and it isn’t my intention. Knowledge about libraries isn’t something that people can just intuit. The existence of libraries is not an a priori truth, right? When people mistake Barnes & Noble for a library it says more about LibraryLand’s marketing efforts and people’s expectations than it does of their intelligence.

Expect some more great quotes as I delve a bit deeper into the video!

I’m excited to be the first in a great series of informal talks held by OPAL. It’ll be like an afternoon in Portland drinking coffee and talking. But we’ll be dry! Lifted from their site:

Friday, November 30, 2007 beginning at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time, 1:00 Central, noon Mountain, 11:00 a.m. Pacific, and 7:00 p.m. GMT/UTC/Zulu:

A Casual Conversation with Aaron Schmidt

Aaron Schmidt is the Director of the North Plains Public Library in Oregon and a blogger at Walking Paper. The Casual Conversations series is designed to be up-close and personal from a respectable online distance. While there are many conferences (in-person, online, and in-world) where librarians can hear leaders in the field make formal presentations about interesting projects, there are few opportunities to hear these same leaders discuss informally what they currently are working on, their future plans and goals, the challenges and opportunities facing librarianship, their personal pet peeves, etc.

Watch for more information about these upcoming Casual Conversations:

Thursday, Dec. 6, 2007: Meredith Farkas
Friday, Jan. 18, 2008: Curtis Rogers
Friday, Feb. 8, 2008: Lori Bell
Friday, Feb. 15, 2008: Michelle Boule
Friday, March 28, 2008: Marshall Breeding
Friday, April 11, 2008: Jenny Levine
Friday, May 16, 2008: Stephen Abram
Friday, June 6, 2008: Michael Stephens

il2005 – 326
il05 – 564
total – 890 (as of 27 October 06)
total – 705 (as of this post) < ---- less photos! huh?

il2006 – 1,880
il06 – 117
total – 1997 (as of 27 October 06)
total – 2190 (as of this post)

And this year?

il2007 – 2410
il07 – 131
total – 2541 (as of this post)

I made an attractive graph because it is really easy to do in Keynote.

All I can conclude from this data is that librarians are finding it increasingly fun to photograph sea lions.