<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: use a mobile device for authentic text communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkingpaper.org/805/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/805</link>
	<description>A library weblog by Aaron Schmidt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:02:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/805/comment-page-1#comment-24134</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/?p=805#comment-24134</guid>
		<description>great points about authenticity - this is a good lens to look at the world through. i&#039;m a little stuck on how it applies to text messaging, though. 

i simply don&#039;t understand (which isn&#039;t to say there might not be truth to it) why people would prefer to text people they know are using a mobile device. some case studies in this area would be valuable. 

it is pretty well documented/researched that virtual reference users prefer to know who they are communicating with, which (for me) is a better explanation for why a device-based sms service might be better than something like textalibrarian.com for a departmental library.

the funny thing to me is that in many cases pretending to be a patrons&#039; personal friend is the one of the least authentic experiences we can offer. 

most successful websites i can think of enhance, or in some cases are complimented by, face-to-face relationships and it is great to see this in action in reference using *any* communication mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great points about authenticity &#8211; this is a good lens to look at the world through. i&#8217;m a little stuck on how it applies to text messaging, though. </p>
<p>i simply don&#8217;t understand (which isn&#8217;t to say there might not be truth to it) why people would prefer to text people they know are using a mobile device. some case studies in this area would be valuable. </p>
<p>it is pretty well documented/researched that virtual reference users prefer to know who they are communicating with, which (for me) is a better explanation for why a device-based sms service might be better than something like textalibrarian.com for a departmental library.</p>
<p>the funny thing to me is that in many cases pretending to be a patrons&#8217; personal friend is the one of the least authentic experiences we can offer. </p>
<p>most successful websites i can think of enhance, or in some cases are complimented by, face-to-face relationships and it is great to see this in action in reference using *any* communication mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
