<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: i </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkingpaper.org/535/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/535</link>
	<description>A library design consultancy, shop and blog by Aaron Schmidt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/535/comment-page-1#comment-23937</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/535#comment-23937</guid>
		<description>@Jomichele-

There won&#039;t be any problems linking to your catalog, nor databases.  Your site will be a totally normal website w/o any limitations.

However, you really should host your own site.  wordpress.com blogs are a bit limited and not as flexible.  Plus, you can keep your library&#039;s URL is you host your own.

email me at librarian[at]gmail[dot]com if you have more questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jomichele-</p>
<p>There won&#8217;t be any problems linking to your catalog, nor databases.  Your site will be a totally normal website w/o any limitations.</p>
<p>However, you really should host your own site.  wordpress.com blogs are a bit limited and not as flexible.  Plus, you can keep your library&#8217;s URL is you host your own.</p>
<p>email me at librarian[at]gmail[dot]com if you have more questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jomichele</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/535/comment-page-1#comment-23928</link>
		<dc:creator>Jomichele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/535#comment-23928</guid>
		<description>Hello Aaron,
I&#039;m a librarian at a small public library in coastal British Columbia. I am desperate to improve the looks and organization of our website.  http://www.powellriverlibrary.ca/   It&#039;s a fright!  
My friend just put me on to the idea of using a lovely wordpress template for our very simple website.  
As someone who has actually got wordpress-based library websites up and running, your advice on a few matters would be most appreciated. 
Can you foresee any problems that would prevent us from linking to our catalogue, which is hosted in Vancouver. Likewise would there be any problems linking to our subscription databases? And is there any reason why we would want to continue to pay for somebody to host our new website rather than use the free hosting available with the free wordpress blogs?  
As you can tell, I know just enough about this stuff to formulate questions. I am somewhat functional in webpage design, if I am using some nice WYSIWYG software, but frankly don&#039;t have a lot of confidence with HTML.  
I appreciate your time, and look forward to hearing from you.  Jomichele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Aaron,<br />
I&#8217;m a librarian at a small public library in coastal British Columbia. I am desperate to improve the looks and organization of our website.  <a href="http://www.powellriverlibrary.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://www.powellriverlibrary.ca/</a>   It&#8217;s a fright!<br />
My friend just put me on to the idea of using a lovely wordpress template for our very simple website.<br />
As someone who has actually got wordpress-based library websites up and running, your advice on a few matters would be most appreciated.<br />
Can you foresee any problems that would prevent us from linking to our catalogue, which is hosted in Vancouver. Likewise would there be any problems linking to our subscription databases? And is there any reason why we would want to continue to pay for somebody to host our new website rather than use the free hosting available with the free wordpress blogs?<br />
As you can tell, I know just enough about this stuff to formulate questions. I am somewhat functional in webpage design, if I am using some nice WYSIWYG software, but frankly don&#8217;t have a lot of confidence with HTML.<br />
I appreciate your time, and look forward to hearing from you.  Jomichele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/535/comment-page-1#comment-20921</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/535#comment-20921</guid>
		<description>Good work, Laura.  I bet your personally written descriptions are really popular!  With any luck we&#039;ll be able to do more things like this soon.  I think the personalization adds some serious value and makes things more human.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work, Laura.  I bet your personally written descriptions are really popular!  With any luck we&#8217;ll be able to do more things like this soon.  I think the personalization adds some serious value and makes things more human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/535/comment-page-1#comment-20920</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/535#comment-20920</guid>
		<description>Well, I must admit that I spend a tremendous amount of time writing up blurbs about new books (and hand-composing the URLs, since there&#039;s no way to do it automatically) for &lt;a href=&quot;http://parkcountylibrary.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;our library website&lt;/a&gt; and our new books newsletter.  But I get people thanking me for the newsletter (which goes out over that 20th century technology known as e-mail) regularly when I talk with library patrons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I must admit that I spend a tremendous amount of time writing up blurbs about new books (and hand-composing the URLs, since there&#8217;s no way to do it automatically) for <a href="http://parkcountylibrary.org" rel="nofollow">our library website</a> and our new books newsletter.  But I get people thanking me for the newsletter (which goes out over that 20th century technology known as e-mail) regularly when I talk with library patrons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/535/comment-page-1#comment-20918</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/535#comment-20918</guid>
		<description>I like Polaris, but give me a freaking break. They haven&#039;t implemented scoped feeds because no one has asked for it? Are you kidding me? I had this same problem with Innovative and just getting RSS in the first place (which I guess they&#039;re *finally* coming around to after five years of kvetching and saying no one was asking for it).

Sometimes you have to use common sense and understand that maybe you ought to do something because it would help your users (in this case, paying customers). You know, &quot;lead.&quot;

If I had time, I&#039;d look up how Polaris is advertising RSS from the catalog and what benefits they&#039;re touting and then ask if they really intend that to be consortium-based only. Because it seems silly to think that a library won&#039;t want to display *just its own new items.* 

I wonder if the answer isn&#039;t that they&#039;re just no thinking consortially and are still focused on single-library sales? I thought they were moving away from that, but I&#039;d rather that be the answer than what Michael has heard.

Cranky Monday morning, but I mean really, come on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Polaris, but give me a freaking break. They haven&#8217;t implemented scoped feeds because no one has asked for it? Are you kidding me? I had this same problem with Innovative and just getting RSS in the first place (which I guess they&#8217;re *finally* coming around to after five years of kvetching and saying no one was asking for it).</p>
<p>Sometimes you have to use common sense and understand that maybe you ought to do something because it would help your users (in this case, paying customers). You know, &#8220;lead.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I had time, I&#8217;d look up how Polaris is advertising RSS from the catalog and what benefits they&#8217;re touting and then ask if they really intend that to be consortium-based only. Because it seems silly to think that a library won&#8217;t want to display *just its own new items.* </p>
<p>I wonder if the answer isn&#8217;t that they&#8217;re just no thinking consortially and are still focused on single-library sales? I thought they were moving away from that, but I&#8217;d rather that be the answer than what Michael has heard.</p>
<p>Cranky Monday morning, but I mean really, come on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

