<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: let&#8217;s work together to get rid of library fines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483</link>
	<description>A library weblog by Aaron Schmidt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:20:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The OPLIN 4cast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 4cast #76: Digitization, Experimentation, Comcast, Fines</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-23715</link>
		<dc:creator>The OPLIN 4cast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 4cast #76: Digitization, Experimentation, Comcast, Fines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-23715</guid>
		<description>[...] let&#8217;s work together to get rid of library fines (walking paper) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let&#8217;s work together to get rid of library fines (walking paper) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Thomas Olsen</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20245</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Thomas Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20245</guid>
		<description>It might interest people to know that many public
  and college libraries did NOT charge fines, when 
  first opened. This is why many very old books have
  &quot;Somewhere Free Library&quot; stamped on them, as once
  it was free to borrow books.
  You can figure out what happend can&#039;t you? People
  kept the books, since there was no penalty for not
  returning them. So in order to get items returned
  most libraries had to institute fines.
  While it&#039;s all very nice to have no barriers to service
  or negative ideas like fines--human nature doesn&#039;t
  always make this workable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might interest people to know that many public<br />
  and college libraries did NOT charge fines, when<br />
  first opened. This is why many very old books have<br />
  &#8220;Somewhere Free Library&#8221; stamped on them, as once<br />
  it was free to borrow books.<br />
  You can figure out what happend can&#8217;t you? People<br />
  kept the books, since there was no penalty for not<br />
  returning them. So in order to get items returned<br />
  most libraries had to institute fines.<br />
  While it&#8217;s all very nice to have no barriers to service<br />
  or negative ideas like fines&#8211;human nature doesn&#8217;t<br />
  always make this workable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Roche</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20228</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Roche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20228</guid>
		<description>I like the recall idea in conjunction with a longer or open ended or even negotiable checkout period. You want hot items back quickly, but there are a lot of older items that spend way too much time on the shelf. If more of them were out more of the time, we could actually keep more of them in the collection.  People could have less in demand items longer.  More people would be happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the recall idea in conjunction with a longer or open ended or even negotiable checkout period. You want hot items back quickly, but there are a lot of older items that spend way too much time on the shelf. If more of them were out more of the time, we could actually keep more of them in the collection.  People could have less in demand items longer.  More people would be happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20166</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20166</guid>
		<description>Done!  And two libraries added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done!  And two libraries added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Harwell</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Harwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20165</guid>
		<description>How about adding a page to the wiki for listing libaries of various types that don&#039;t charge fines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about adding a page to the wiki for listing libaries of various types that don&#8217;t charge fines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20118</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20118</guid>
		<description>In an academic library I worked in we didn&#039;t charge fines, and we didn&#039;t send overdue notices.  When someone else wanted something someone had out we sent a Recall notice.  At other libraries I&#039;ve worked in since, people tell me that won&#039;t work because we want the books on the shelves, so people can find them when they browse.  (Folks are much more used to placing holds on things that are out now, so I think this argument is less valid, even though I didn&#039;t think it that valid then.)   Many libraries, unfortunately, use fines as a source of income, more than incentive to get books back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an academic library I worked in we didn&#8217;t charge fines, and we didn&#8217;t send overdue notices.  When someone else wanted something someone had out we sent a Recall notice.  At other libraries I&#8217;ve worked in since, people tell me that won&#8217;t work because we want the books on the shelves, so people can find them when they browse.  (Folks are much more used to placing holds on things that are out now, so I think this argument is less valid, even though I didn&#8217;t think it that valid then.)   Many libraries, unfortunately, use fines as a source of income, more than incentive to get books back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mona</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20116</link>
		<dc:creator>mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20116</guid>
		<description>our library does this. we freeze their borrowing privileges until they bring back the item or replace it if it&#039;s lost. it works okay i think. they want to borrow more items so they are motivated to bring overdue items back. also, families share one account (we&#039;re an army post library) so we don&#039;t have to worry about more than one account in a family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>our library does this. we freeze their borrowing privileges until they bring back the item or replace it if it&#8217;s lost. it works okay i think. they want to borrow more items so they are motivated to bring overdue items back. also, families share one account (we&#8217;re an army post library) so we don&#8217;t have to worry about more than one account in a family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20115</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20115</guid>
		<description>Many, many years ago for a research project in library school, I used Library Journal to study whether fines have any impact on patrons returning library materials.  My conclusion was they do not.  I uncovered a whole lot of interesting social history, such as using Western Union to notify patrons they have overdue materials and using the local police to recover materials, but in the end, there was no evidence fines made a difference.  For what it&#039;s worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many, many years ago for a research project in library school, I used Library Journal to study whether fines have any impact on patrons returning library materials.  My conclusion was they do not.  I uncovered a whole lot of interesting social history, such as using Western Union to notify patrons they have overdue materials and using the local police to recover materials, but in the end, there was no evidence fines made a difference.  For what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: effing</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20114</link>
		<dc:creator>effing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20114</guid>
		<description>not sure how I feel about this, but whatever works...I&#039;ll keep checking back to see your progress.  don&#039;t run out of salsa next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure how I feel about this, but whatever works&#8230;I&#8217;ll keep checking back to see your progress.  don&#8217;t run out of salsa next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20113</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20113</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe Libraries could do creative things like amnesties, community work, etc.  One of the biggest expenses after tuition and books at College was overdue fees.

Great thing about college: you don&#039;t pay the fees, you don&#039;t get the diploma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe Libraries could do creative things like amnesties, community work, etc.  One of the biggest expenses after tuition and books at College was overdue fees.</p>
<p>Great thing about college: you don&#8217;t pay the fees, you don&#8217;t get the diploma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekChic</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20112</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekChic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20112</guid>
		<description>Interesting proposals. Funnily enough, both my current and former places of work did survey patrons about fines and whether the library should keep using them. In both cases, the percentage in favour of keeping fines was overwhelming (around 80% in both cases). Patrons who commented felt that people should be punished for depriving others of the use of the materials (particularly when the library couldn&#039;t afford multiple copies) and they didn&#039;t feel that a simple suspension of privileges was good enough - they felt this condoned theft, especially by families with multiple cards. Staff at both libraries were quite surprised by these results... but there they are. It would be interesting to see if the patrons still feel this way as the surveys were done around 5 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting proposals. Funnily enough, both my current and former places of work did survey patrons about fines and whether the library should keep using them. In both cases, the percentage in favour of keeping fines was overwhelming (around 80% in both cases). Patrons who commented felt that people should be punished for depriving others of the use of the materials (particularly when the library couldn&#8217;t afford multiple copies) and they didn&#8217;t feel that a simple suspension of privileges was good enough &#8211; they felt this condoned theft, especially by families with multiple cards. Staff at both libraries were quite surprised by these results&#8230; but there they are. It would be interesting to see if the patrons still feel this way as the surveys were done around 5 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sylvie</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/483/comment-page-1#comment-20111</link>
		<dc:creator>sylvie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingpaper.org/483#comment-20111</guid>
		<description>love it, specially the fresh (to me):
How will we get our items back into the library?
Consider implementing a â€œno overdueâ€ policy in which patrons that have even one item overdue (that canâ€™t be renewed) canâ€™t check out any more library materials.
thanks for ringing a clear bell.

&quot;A fine is a tax for doing wrong.  A tax is a fine for doing well...&quot;  author unknown
I don&#039;t like either in libraries...  ;)  sylvie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love it, specially the fresh (to me):<br />
How will we get our items back into the library?<br />
Consider implementing a â€œno overdueâ€ policy in which patrons that have even one item overdue (that canâ€™t be renewed) canâ€™t check out any more library materials.<br />
thanks for ringing a clear bell.</p>
<p>&#8220;A fine is a tax for doing wrong.  A tax is a fine for doing well&#8230;&#8221;  author unknown<br />
I don&#8217;t like either in libraries&#8230;  ;)  sylvie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
