<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: flickr at IL2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkingpaper.org/356/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/356</link>
	<description>A library design consultancy, shop and blog by Aaron Schmidt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flickr at IL2007 at walking paper</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/356/comment-page-1#comment-20519</link>
		<dc:creator>flickr at IL2007 at walking paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkingpaper.org/?p=356#comment-20519</guid>
		<description>[...] an update to my post flickr at IL2006 which I posted on 27 October 2006. I&#8217;m not quite sure why but I&#8217;m interested in seeing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an update to my post flickr at IL2006 which I posted on 27 October 2006. I&#8217;m not quite sure why but I&#8217;m interested in seeing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingpaper.org/356/comment-page-1#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkingpaper.org/?p=356#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>Aaron,

I think your point is exactly right.  Still, I think there are a couple of other factors in the ALA increase from 2005 to 2006.

1) There was not as much awareness of the ala2005 tag as there was the ala2006 tag.  I tagged my 2005 photos as ALAconference, not knowing the other.

2) There was a lot more to photograph in New Orleans, with the volunteer efforts and the hurricane tours.  There was a tremendous feeling of mission among the attendees to report on what had happened in New Orleans.  I know I posted 11 photos from Chicago 2005 and then posted 85 from New Orleans.

I like the noise photos.  There are seals as well as sea lions.

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>I think your point is exactly right.  Still, I think there are a couple of other factors in the ALA increase from 2005 to 2006.</p>
<p>1) There was not as much awareness of the ala2005 tag as there was the ala2006 tag.  I tagged my 2005 photos as ALAconference, not knowing the other.</p>
<p>2) There was a lot more to photograph in New Orleans, with the volunteer efforts and the hurricane tours.  There was a tremendous feeling of mission among the attendees to report on what had happened in New Orleans.  I know I posted 11 photos from Chicago 2005 and then posted 85 from New Orleans.</p>
<p>I like the noise photos.  There are seals as well as sea lions.</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

